Probate Q&A Series

Is it a conflict of interest for an attorney in North Carolina to handle probate administration when they previously drafted the will?

Detailed Answer

In North Carolina, an attorney may wear two hats in an estate case: one as the drafter of a will and another as the personal representative’s legal advisor during probate. At first glance, the roles seem complementary. The attorney already knows the terms of the will and the client’s goals. However, the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct guard against situations that could compromise an attorney’s loyalty or independent judgment.

Rule 1.7 of the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct prohibits representation if a concurrent conflict of interest exists. A conflict of interest may arise when the lawyer’s duties to the estate beneficiaries, the personal representative, and the testator’s intent pull in different directions. For example:

  • If a beneficiary challenges a will provision drafted by the attorney, the attorney may find it hard to remain fully objective.
  • If the personal representative’s decisions create tension among heirs, the attorney might struggle to advocate impartially for both the representative and the beneficiaries.

When an actual conflict exists, the attorney must decline or withdraw. Yet not every relationship triggers a disqualifying conflict. Under Rule 1.7(b), the attorney may proceed if:

  • The attorney reasonably believes they can provide competent and diligent representation;
  • The representation does not involve asserting positions adverse to one client against another; and
  • All affected clients give informed, written consent.

In a probate context, the key clients are the personal representative and the beneficiaries. To obtain informed consent, the attorney must:

  • Explain the risks posed by the dual role;
  • Identify potential disputes that could arise;
  • Ensure each client understands their right to independent counsel; and
  • Document consent in writing before continuing.

Absent informed consent, the attorney runs the risk of discipline under North Carolina General Statutes § 84-4 (disciplinary grounds) for breaching professional duties. In addition, a court may remove the attorney as advisor to the estate if a beneficiary proves a conflict impaired the administration’s fairness.

Key Points to Consider

  • Conflict Analysis: Use Rule 1.7 to identify any duty clashes between will drafting and estate administration.
  • Informed Consent: Secure written consent from the personal representative and all beneficiaries before moving forward.
  • Documentation: Keep clear records of disclosures, consent forms, and any communications about potential conflicts.
  • Independent Advice: Encourage each beneficiary to seek separate counsel if tensions arise.
  • Statutory Duties: Remember that a personal representative must act under Chapter 28A, Article 13 of the North Carolina General Statutes.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Navigating a potential conflict of interest in probate can feel complex. You deserve clear advice and confident representation. At Pierce Law Group, our attorneys have guided hundreds of families through estate administration. We’ll assess any conflict issues, explain them in plain English, and help you decide on informed consent or alternative counsel.

Contact Pierce Law Group today for a personalized review of your probate matter. Email us at intake@piercelaw.com or call us at (919) 341-7055. Let us help you honor your loved one’s final wishes and keep the probate process on track.