Probate Q&A Series

If the original will is gone, how can the court figure out what it said and who the executor was supposed to be? – North Carolina

Short Answer

In North Carolina, the Clerk of Superior Court (as the judge of probate) can still admit a will to probate even if the original cannot be found, but only if the person offering the will proves a “lost or destroyed will.” That usually means proving the will was properly signed, proving what it said (often with a copy or reliable witness testimony), and proving the will was not missing because the decedent intentionally revoked it. If the lost will is admitted, the clerk can issue letters testamentary to the executor named in that will.

Understanding the Problem

In North Carolina probate, the key question is: if a decedent’s original will cannot be located, can an interested person still ask the Clerk of Superior Court to treat a copy (or other proof) as the decedent’s will and appoint the executor named in it? This issue often comes up when a family member claims the will was destroyed, misplaced, or withheld, and the estate administration has already started based on a different will or on intestacy (no will). The decision point is whether the missing original can be proven as a valid “lost or destroyed will” so the court can follow the decedent’s written instructions, including the executor nomination.

Apply the Law

In North Carolina, probate and estate administration are handled in the Superior Court Division and are exercised day-to-day by the Clerk of Superior Court. When an original will is missing, the person trying to rely on that will (often called the “propounder”) must present strong evidence that (1) a valid will existed, (2) what it said, and (3) why the original is missing. A major hurdle is the common presumption that if the will was last in the decedent’s possession and cannot be found after death, the decedent likely destroyed it to revoke it. The propounder must rebut that presumption with evidence showing the loss or destruction was not done by the decedent (and not done at the decedent’s direction) as a revocation.

Key Requirements

  • Prove the will was validly executed: Evidence must show the will was signed and witnessed (or otherwise valid under North Carolina rules) so the clerk can treat it as a real will, not just a draft.
  • Prove the contents (including the executor clause): The clerk must be able to determine what the will said—who inherits and who was nominated as executor—using a copy, reliable testimony, or other competent evidence.
  • Explain the missing original and overcome revocation concerns: Evidence must show the will is missing because it was lost, destroyed, or withheld, and not because the decedent revoked it.

What the Statutes Say

Analysis

Apply the Rule to the Facts: The facts described include an allegation that a relative and the relative’s partner destroyed the decedent’s will, plus a text message referencing that destruction and a belief that the will named a different executor and excluded the relative. Those facts go directly to the “missing original” requirement and can help rebut the idea that the decedent personally revoked the will. The next practical question is proof of contents and execution—whether a copy exists, whether the drafting attorney has a file copy, and whether witnesses (or other competent evidence) can establish that the will was properly signed and what it said about the executor and beneficiaries.

Process & Timing

  1. Who files: Usually an executor named in the lost will, a beneficiary under that will, or another interested person. Where: The Clerk of Superior Court (Estates Division) in the county where the estate is being administered in North Carolina. What: A filing asking the clerk to admit a lost or destroyed will (often supported by a verified petition/affidavits) and to issue letters testamentary to the executor named in that will. When: As soon as the missing-will issue is discovered, especially if the estate is already moving forward under a different will or without a will.
  2. Evidence gathering: The propounder typically collects the best available proof of (a) due execution (witness affidavits if available, or other competent evidence if not), (b) the will’s contents (a copy is strong evidence, but testimony can be used if a copy is unavailable), and (c) a diligent search for the original plus facts showing the will was not revoked.
  3. Hearing and dispute path: The clerk may decide the probate issue based on the evidence presented. If there is a real factual dispute about whether the will existed, what it said, or whether it was revoked, the dispute can become contested and may be transferred for a jury to decide specific fact issues under the procedures used for establishing will contents when denied.

Exceptions & Pitfalls

  • Presumption of revocation: If the original will was last known to be in the decedent’s possession and cannot be found at death, the court may presume the decedent revoked it. Evidence of third-party destruction or withholding (and the circumstances around it) is often critical to rebut that presumption.
  • Proving contents is not just “someone said so”: The clerk needs enough reliable detail to determine the actual terms, including the executor nomination. A file copy, a scanned copy, drafts with confirmation they match the signed version, or credible witness testimony can matter.
  • Execution proof problems: If subscribing witnesses cannot be located, the propounder should be prepared to explain why and present the best competent evidence available to show the will was properly executed.
  • Estate already “largely moved forward”: If letters have already issued to someone else, the remedy may involve more than simply filing a copy; it can require contested probate steps and court orders addressing prior actions taken in the estate.
  • Do not rely on texts alone: A text referencing destruction can support the “why the original is missing” element, but the court still needs proof of execution and proof of the will’s contents.

Conclusion

North Carolina courts can determine what a missing will said—and who the executor was supposed to be—by using the state’s lost-or-destroyed-will process through the Clerk of Superior Court. The person offering the will must prove the will was properly executed, prove its contents (including the executor clause), and prove the original is missing for reasons other than the decedent revoking it. The most important next step is to file a lost-will petition with the Clerk of Superior Court promptly after the missing will is discovered.

Talk to a Probate Attorney

If you’re dealing with a missing will and concerns that the wrong person was appointed to handle the estate, our firm has experienced attorneys who can help you understand your options and timelines. Call us today at [919-341-7055].

Disclaimer: This article provides general information about North Carolina law based on the single question stated above. It is not legal advice for your specific situation and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws, procedures, and local practice can change and may vary by county. If you have a deadline, act promptly and speak with a licensed North Carolina attorney.