Probate Q&A Series

How can I challenge a will if I believe a family member committed fraud or undue influence? – North Carolina

Short Answer

In North Carolina, the usual way to challenge a will for fraud or undue influence is to file a caveat in the decedent’s estate file with the Clerk of Superior Court. In most cases, the caveat must be filed within three years after the will is probated, and the case is then transferred to Superior Court for a jury trial. A caveat is a civil process focused on whether the will is valid, and it does not require pursuing criminal charges.

Understanding the Problem

In North Carolina probate, the key question is: can a person challenge a will because a family member used fraud or undue influence to get the will signed or changed? The actor is an interested person in the estate, and the relief sought is a court decision that the document offered as the will should not control the estate. The trigger is usually that the will has been filed for probate (or already probated), and timing matters because North Carolina sets a specific window to start the challenge.

Apply the Law

North Carolina treats a will contest as a specific type of case called a caveat proceeding. A caveat is filed in the estate file before the Clerk of Superior Court, and then the dispute is transferred to Superior Court for a jury trial. The central issue is whether the document is the decedent’s valid will (often framed as “devisavit vel non”). A common deadline is that a caveat generally must be filed within three years after the will is probated, with limited exceptions.

Key Requirements

  • Standing (an “interested” person): The challenger must have a real stake in the estate (for example, someone who would inherit if the challenged will is set aside).
  • A recognized ground to invalidate the will: Fraud or undue influence must connect to the making, signing, or contents of the will in a way that calls the will’s validity into question.
  • Timely filing in the correct forum: The caveat must be filed in the decedent’s estate file with the Clerk of Superior Court, usually within the three-year window after probate, and then properly served on interested parties.

What the Statutes Say

Analysis

Apply the Rule to the Facts: The facts describe newly discovered proof suggesting a relative engaged in conduct that could support a fraud or undue influence claim tied to a will. Under North Carolina practice, the next step usually is not a criminal complaint; it is preserving the evidence and evaluating whether the proof supports a timely caveat by an interested person. If the will has already been probated, the three-year caveat clock is often the most important timing issue to confirm right away.

Process & Timing

  1. Who files: An interested person (often an heir or beneficiary affected by the will). Where: The decedent’s estate file with the Clerk of Superior Court in the county where the estate is administered. What: A caveat filed in the estate file, followed by proper service on interested parties. When: Usually within three years after the will is probated.
  2. Transfer and alignment: After the caveat is filed, the matter is transferred to Superior Court for a jury trial, and the court holds a process to align interested parties on the “caveator” side or the “propounder” (will-supporting) side. Deadlines to respond and participate can run quickly once service occurs.
  3. Evidence and resolution: The parties exchange information and prepare proof about how the will was made, who was involved, and whether fraud or undue influence affected the will. The case may resolve by agreement or proceed to a jury decision on whether the will is valid.

Exceptions & Pitfalls

  • Waiting too long: The three-year caveat period is often treated as a hard deadline, and late filing can end the case before it starts.
  • Trying to caveat before probate: A caveat generally depends on a will actually being probated (or at least an application for probate being in motion), so timing and posture matter.
  • Evidence handling mistakes: Altering originals, confronting witnesses aggressively, or sharing sensitive proof widely can create credibility problems or spoliation arguments. A safer approach is to preserve copies, document how the proof was obtained, and get legal advice on how to use it in the civil case.
  • Unintended consequences for the estate: A caveat can pause distributions and change what the personal representative can do while the case is pending, which can affect family dynamics and estate administration.

Conclusion

In North Carolina, the standard way to challenge a will based on fraud or undue influence is to file a caveat in the decedent’s estate file with the Clerk of Superior Court, after which the dispute is transferred to Superior Court for a jury trial. The key threshold is standing as an interested person, and the key timing rule is that a caveat usually must be filed within three years after the will is probated. Next step: confirm the probate date and file the caveat with the Clerk before the three-year deadline expires.

Talk to a Probate Attorney

If there are concerns that a will was the product of fraud or undue influence, a caveat can protect rights while the court sorts out what document should control the estate. Our firm has experienced attorneys who can help explain options, preserve evidence appropriately, and track deadlines. Call us today at [CONTACT NUMBER].

Disclaimer: This article provides general information about North Carolina law based on the single question stated above. It is not legal advice for your specific situation and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws, procedures, and local practice can change and may vary by county. If you have a deadline, act promptly and speak with a licensed North Carolina attorney.